Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@928JSGK3yrs3Y
No, public transportation should be free
@937LQYX3yrs3Y
Yes but by utilizing more efficient private company services.
@8R2RMP34yrs4Y
Regardless, this should be decided at the state and local level.
@8R2RMP34yrs4Y
Yes, and we should privatize more public transportation systems.
@8R2RMP34yrs4Y
No, this should be decided at the state and local level.
@92MDVFR3yrs3Y
Where would the funding go to? Many metropolitan areas already have sufficient methods, so increasing subsidies to those cities would deny developing cities the budgets that they would require to address their growing needs. However, if the money would be distributed to cities with growing populations and inadequate systems, then yes, the spending would be warranted.
@8H72GPZ5yrs5Y
Public transportation funding needs to come from the state government because needs are different in each state.
@84JHJXZ4yrs4Y
No, keep it at the state level
@8R7SQ2V4yrs4Y
Not right now, but once the deficit is reduced then yes.
@63ZXW6N4yrs4Y
Should be decided on state level.
@76WTH563yrs3Y
It should be the states' decision.
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
Yes, this will help those who are low-income to get around
@7GP32QV4yrs4Y
Yes, it will help those who are low-income to get around
@7C3ZZ8M4yrs4Y
Yes, but only by reallocating funds from other government expenses, whether that would be from military, medicare, social security, etc, but not in an excessive amount to where it dramatically impacts those categories.
@8CV6FZ55yrs5Y
we should have public funding for all infastructures.
@8FCYBSY5yrs5Y
If only people start to take care of what is given to them to help them.
@kaparker5yrs5Y
Yes, but only to low income areas or particularly in need of public transportation
@8PH55464yrs4Y
It should be regulated county by county.
Join in on more popular conversations.
